You Still Here

[{"type":"text","text":"Other than that, how was your day???"}]

You still here 5 16 23

Cowboy State Daily is Wyoming’s largest newspaper with Wyoming’s most experienced journalists. 

<title>You Still Here? Tuesday, May 16, 2023 | Cowboy State Daily</title>

Other than that, how was your day?

You Still Here? Tuesday, May 16, 2023

Headshot of Cowboy State Daily's general assignment reporter, Clair McFarland.

Clair McFarland

Government & Politics

Politics

As of Monday, 35 Wyoming political candidates have sworn to love their enemies.

 after the public killing of conservative icon Charlie Kirk, and has since been working to restore the servant spirit and civility to the public arena in Wyoming.

The Tuesday after the May 14-29 filing period ended for political candidates, the group sent each candidate a pledge, group incorporator Matt Micheli told Cowboy State Daily.

“I will love my enemies, not just my friends. I will stand faithfully upon my convictions without giving into cruelty,” the pledge says. “I will call out wrongdoing without canceling people. 

"I will refuse to let the letters on someone’s hat or the hashtags in their bio mean more to me than the Gospel. I will not be swept up in the outrage cycle, but will instead step out of the chaos and boldly examine my own actions.”

The signers also commit to “bring the peace of Christ back into the public square — to show a divided world what it truly looks like to follow Him, not as a culture warrior but as a Kingdom person.”

The pledge invokes the group’s founding verse, Matthew 5:9: “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God.”

Two of the three GOP candidates for governor had signed the document as of Monday: Sen. Eric Barlow and Superintendent of Public Instruction Megan Degenfelder.

So too had three of the 10 Republican U.S. House candidates: Senate President Bo Biteman, former Superintendent of Public Instruction Jillian Balow, and Casper-based veteran Kevin Christensen. U.S. Senate candidate Jimmy Skovgard is also among the signers.

In the governor’s race, Barlow told Cowboy State Daily he doesn’t normally answer candidate questionnaires, but this one was “quite simple” and in line with the promise he made last year to run a clean campaign anyway.

“And whether we agree on issues or don’t, we can still be respectful and honoring of them as, you know, fellow human beings,” Barlow said.

Degenfelder in an email said she's a "devout follo

wer of Christ and certainly agree that politics has become increasingly unchristian."

"People of faith can and should do better following Christ’s teachings as we engage in debates about policy and Wyoming’s future," she said. "We can do this without compromising on our convictions. I will always take an unequivocal stand on issues that are black and white for me - like protecting the Second Amendment, defending the sanctity of life, reducing taxes, and promoting Wyoming’s legacy industries."

She said she completes other questionnaires from voter groups, the media and industry associations "whenever possible" and sees them as a way to be transparent. 

Another GOP gubernatorial candidate, retired Marine Col. Brent Bien, did not comment in response to an email and voicemail. His campaign

[{"type":"text","text":"Wyoming Can Use It"}]

Cowboy State Daily this pledge could be effective in Wyoming, and that he wants to help the group’s cause.

Another former lawmaker, Fred Harrison, was less optimistic about the pledge’s ability to curb vitriol in the state’s political arena. But he said each person should take the effort seriously.

[{"type":"text","text":"As for Micheli, he said the pledge is meant to be unique."}]

[{"type":"text","text":"Wyoming candidates face a number of pledges and have for years."}]

In 2020, the group Wyoming Gun Owners launched a pledge-style survey to candidates and derided the political hopefuls who didn’t sign it with phrases 

, “(it’s) a very dangerous situation for gun owners,” or “we all know what that means.”

More recently, the Wyoming Republican Party and its county subgroups launched a candidate pledge based on the state party platform. 

Some candidates have pointed to inconsistencies in the platform wording and called the 

 Others have called it a much-needed revival call for Wyoming’s broad-based GOP.

Micheli said the Peacemakers pledge isn’t meant to be used as ammunition, because its wording discourages that.

“The goal of this is kind of the opposite of all these other pledges you see out there,” he said. “The other pledges are kind of putting people into tribes and trying to figure out what tribe you’re in.”

Micheli said this pledge, however, tells each candidate to “look inward” and improve instead of “hammering anybody else over the head with it.”  

[{"type":"text","text":"Might Just Work"}]

Peterson, who served in the Wyoming Senate from 2005 to 2018, lauded the effort.

[{"type":"text","text":"“I could certainly get behind a movement like that,” said Peterson."}]

Peterson had voiced similar goals one week prior on a live video interview on Cowboy State Daily's Morning Show With Jake, 

Though the effort is “the light at the end of the tunnel” in what Peterson cast as a darkening, exhausting political arena, people will have to refocus on one another as fellow human beings to make it work, he said.

“If you love the person that’s opposed to either your way of life or philosophy or way of thinking,” he said, “and in your mind, your core belief is this is a brother, a sister, a person — and I don’t know what life experiences they’ve had, what brought them to the beliefs they have — it at least gives (one) the courtesy to be patient and listen.”

It takes effort to see the person through the issues. It’s also difficult to ratchet people down from the fiery realms to which public discourse has risen, said Peterson.

“It’s hard work to listen to somebody yelling and screaming at the top of their lungs, random thoughts and things to be argumentative … and say, ‘Oh, I can see you’re very passionate about your belief but you’re not making any sense,’” he said.

Rules of decorum in public arenas, the humility to apologize to one another where necessary, and applying mental rigor toward the actual issues are the way back to civility, Peterson added.

If people avoid dehumanizing and screaming at each other, their conversation will also get smarter, he said.

[{"type":"text","text":"Starting With You"}]

Harrison wasn’t as optimistic as Peterson, but called the pledge’s mission a worthy undertaking for each individual regardless of what society does.

“I’m not seeing a willingness on both sides of the aisle to discuss (differences),” he said. “I appreciate what they’re doing. I think it’s a wonderful idea.”

But, he added, “I’m not sure it’s always going to work, but that doesn’t mean anything. What did Mother Theresa say? We’re called to be faithful, not successful.”

[{"type":"text","text":"Harrison served in the Legislature from 1983-1992."}]

He was a Democrat then. But, ardently pro-life and socially conservative, he parted ways with the party starting in about 1992 and is now Republican. He’s also grown more fiscally conservative, Harrison said.

Harrison now writes a regular column for Cowboy State Daily in which he often scrutinizes the current state of the judiciary and jurisprudence.

“People think my articles are pretty sharp,” he said with a chuckle. Yet on May 9, he penned a 

 against resorting to violence or violent sentiments against judges, saying that nullifies good arguments on the issues.

If people wish to apply the peacemaker group’s pledge, it will take honest discussion, he said. People also have to start taking the high road and stop de-humanizing each other, he added.

[{"type":"text","text":"The Signers, So Far"}]

Micheli told Cowboy State Daily the group didn’t give candidates a deadline to sign the pledge. So this list isn’t final. As of Monday, the 35 signers spanned the governor’s, congressional, state legislative, and county commission races. They are:

State Superintendent of Public Instruction candidate

Update -  This story has been updated to include a post-publication comment by Megan Degenfelder. 

Mix Collage 23 Jun 2026 06 04 PM 252

<title>35 Candidates, Including Two Wyo Gov Hopefuls, Sign Love Your Enemies Pledge | Cowboy State Daily</title>

The Wyoming group that launched a civility movement after the killing of Charlie Kirk has gotten 35 candidates to sign a peacemaker pledge to love their enemies. That includes gubernatorial candidates Eric Barlow and Megan Degenfelder.

35 Candidates, Including Two Wyo Gov Hopefuls, Sign Love Your Enemies Pledge

Headshot of Cowboy State Daily's business and tourism reporter, Renée Jean

Renée Jean

Energy

Microsoft officials said the company is willing to talk about 

a $50 million community benefits agreement,

 but after Monday night’s Cheyenne City Council vote it won’t be necessary.

The council voted to advance the annexation of a 3,500-acre tract of land into the city, but rejected the idea of a community benefits agreement on an 8-to-3 vote. Cheyenne Mayor Patrick Collins was absent from the meeting.

The tract, roughly one-fifth the size of Cheyenne and adjacent to Microsoft’s existing data centers, is envisioned as a long-term expansion site where it would build its facilities out over the next 10 to 20 years. Supporters have framed the move as key to jobs and the tax base, while opponents have said the city is giving up leverage and reshaping the community without locking in enough concrete benefits or fully understanding water, traffic and neighborhood impacts.

Councilman Larry Wolfe brought the amendment that sought the $50 million agreement, saying it was necessary because of the extraordinary scale of the annexation. 

Wolfe’s proposal outlined collecting $10 million annually for five years starting July 2027 to fund permanent improvements to Cheyenne. The agreement should also spell out an expectation, Wolfe has suggested, that Microsoft will use state-of-the-art technology to minimize water use, eliminate emissions, and set contractual guardrails on as many as 40 different items ranging from traffic and noise to wildlife and affordable housing. 

Collins called the proposal for a $50 million community benefits agreement “extortion” the first time Wolfe mentioned it.

Wolfe asked Microsoft executives whether there would be any harm in a four-month delay so the city could negotiate terms of the annexation. 

Microsoft’s land-development manager Rachel Irwing indicated the company is “willing to work with the city in whatever way is beneficial for both the city and this project” and is “open to discussions,” but added the company does want to move forward on the project as quickly as possible.

Microsoft spokesman Jonathan Noble, meanwhile, said that while the company’s timeline for the development is 10 to 20 years, they don’t plan to wait that long to start.

“That’s the reason why we’re eager to really lay the groundwork, establish the rules, work with city staff, make sure that we are all clear on the investment that is going to require,” Noble said. “That’s investment by Microsoft in conjunction with the city, various other folks, to build out the sewer, water, power, etcetera, and to make sure we are shouldering that cost completely. That takes time to design. It also takes time to build. Our hope is to start building well before that 10-year mark.”

The company could, Noble added, move forward under Laramie County, but felt it was better for the project and the community to proceed under the city. 

Councilman Pete Laybourn, meanwhile, wanted to know if the company had considered an annexation agreement similar to the one made for Sweetgrass, the only other comparably-sized property the city has annexed. 

Noble said the company is not looking for any exemptions from the city’s normal development processes, saying its existing structure has worked for the city and will work for Microsoft.

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"textStyle"},{"type":"bold"}],"text":"Growth Isn’t The Issue"}]

Public comments on Monday underscored a divide over how — not whether — Cheyenne should grow. 

While some residents completely oppose growth, most said they want clearer evidence the city is grasping the pace of development and guiding it to an appropriate landing.

“I’m not here to oppose growth,” long-time real estate broker Wendy Volk told the council. “Wyoming has always embraced innovation, entrepreneurship and opportunity. Economic development matters, and our state has a proud history of powering the nation through agriculture, mining and energy production.”

But even she finds the speed and scale of incoming industrial projects disconcerting.

“I believe we must ask some … broader questions about how we grow and who bears the cost,” she said. “We experience (these projects) cumulatively. We experience increased demands on shared roads. We see growing demands on water systems, emergency services, housing and public infrastructure.”

A key question, Volk added, is the character of southeastern Wyoming left for future generations. 

“Growth itself is not the issue,” she said. “The issue is whether we have a long-term plan and whether growth is paying for its share.”

Volk said it’s fair for the community to ask companies that will benefit from the growth to be stronger partners in building out infrastructure and mitigating impacts.

“Once the character of a community changes, it is difficult to restore,” she said. “I’m not asking for us to stop progress. I’m asking for us to guide it wisely, with transparency, thoughtful planning, and a commitment to ensuring that growth strengthens our communities rather than placing new burdens upon them.”

For Harmony Meadows resident Heather Madrid the lack of a defined plan ahead of approving the annexation is a red flag that says the city isn’t doing it’s job to mind the store.

“The lack of a plan is not a legitimate reason to forgo any kind of annexation agreement,” she said. “In fact it’s quite the opposite. It’s a reason to wait until Microsoft has some idea what they’re doing here.”

Madrid also questioned how the city can claim the annexation will benefit residents when there’s been no examination of how much water will be used, how many backup generators will be necessary, and whether city services such as police, fire, and EMS will be reasonably available.

Without those details, the property is “not ready to be annexed, plain and simple,” Madrid said, adding that “corporate philanthropy is not a substitute for proper planning.”

Those speaking for the data center’s annexation and against any postponement mostly came from building trade groups and from Microsoft itself.

Rob Turse, business agent for Local 192, was among them.

“The sooner we can get our local workers out to work on these projects, the sooner the middle class gets back to normal here in Cheyenne,” he said. “The middle class has been ... it's been hurting for a long time here in Cheyenne. It's been in decline. It really has.”

Multiple individuals talked about leaving volatile oil and gas or traveling construction jobs for steady data center work. That’s allowed them to be home with their families and make a high enough wage to support them.

Kevin Banish talked about growing up in Cheyenne believing there would never be a career for him in Wyoming. 

“Today, there’s hundreds of people building technology centers right here in Cheyenne,” he said. “Over the last 13 years, I’ve watched Microsoft’s presence in our community grow from a few facilities into a major contributor to our local economy.”

The beneficiaries are not buildings, he added, but the people who work there and are now able to make a living closer to home.

“Today, students in Wyoming can look at careers in technology, engineering, construction, operations, networking, and skilled trades, and know that those careers exist right here at home,” he said. “They no longer have to assume that opportunity only exists somewhere else.”

Data centers have made that possible, and Cheyenne has become a recognized leader in the industry, Banish said. 

“Approving this land addition will continue that momentum and position our community for future investment, future jobs, and future opportunities,” he said. “As a lifetime Wyoming resident and as someone who has worked in this industry since 2013, I believe this is a positive step in Cheyenne’s future.”

Councilwoman Kathy Emmons was among those who were displeased with Wolfe's motion, which was supported by Laybourn and Councilman Mark Moody, who earlier proposed a moratorium on data center development.

Moody said Cheyenne needs to more carefully consider the impact of so many data centers built all at once in and around the city.

Emmons said the community benefits agreement was just a new version of the proposed moratorium, which had already been voted down by the council after hours of testimony.

“We went through the whole process, we went through all the readings, we took all of the comment, we heard every single bit of it, we listened, we listened to both sides,” Emmons said. "This council took a vote to deny the moratorium and to move forward. So here we are again, doing the very same thing, which I find incredibly disingenuous.”

A four-month postponement won’t be productive, Emmons added.

“We’ll be in the very same situation, and we’ll just keep doing it over and over,” she said. “That’s not OK for the community who we’re supposed to be entrusted to represent. And it’s not OK for the people who have put in so much hard work on this issue, and we keep dangling this carrot in front of them. So I would encourage my fellow council members to vote no on this amendment.”

Councilman Jeff White said a community benefits agreement such as Wolfe proposed would set a bad precedent. 

“Does Microsoft have deep pockets?” he said. “You bet, but just because they’re a a multi-billion-dollar corporation doesn’t mean we should be treating them differently. The owner of the property wants to engage in a lawful business transaction with a willing buyer.”

Councilman Ken Esquibel suggested that those wanting to stop data centers have picked the wrong venue for their fight.

“If you really want to stop data centers, the building you need to go to is the one with a golden dome, about seven and a half blocks that way,” he said. “The reason data centers come here is because of tax laws, the tax structure in Wyoming, that get set at the state legislative level."

“They're not coming here because the Cheyenne City Council has given them their golden ticket,” he added. “We actually have the strictest regulations for data centers of any city in the country. That's why they want to build in the city, as opposed to the county.”

Wolfe disagreed with the contention his motion was anything like a moratorium. That was a much longer delay, with broader consideration about data centers.

His proposal targets a specific data center project, looking at impacts to the city and addressing them, similar to the annexation agreement used for the Sweetgrass development.

“This comes to us with every single issue you can imagine in an annexation proceeding,” Wolfe said. “When this first arose .. I said we should treat this differently. We should treat this with the enormity and respect that it deserves. We didn’t do that. We treated it with the same respect we treat a 2.7-acre annexation.” 

Wolfe acknowledged many people are on data-center information overload, given how many committees the matter has traveled through, but this is the first time it’s arrived at a full council meeting. 

“There are a host of issues that we should address with this,” he said. “And I’ve been trying to do that. But the biggest issue is that what is proposed here is trying to balance up the benefits with the detriments, the burdens that come from all of these projects.”

Microsoft’s contention that the city will be its best partner for future projects is a telling detail, Wolfe suggested, that points to the city taking more time to think about what the annexation entails and the measures to be agreed upon before the council accepts it.

“That’s all I’ve suggested is that we spend some time talking about what a partnership looks like,” he said. “And guess what, we have a perfect model from 2018, and I have it right here.”

Wolfe was referring to the Sweetgrass annexation, which was Cheyenne’s largest single land annexation. That agreement talks about a range of issues from zoning and traffic to dedication of land for parks and planned development.

“It’s in all of our interests, members of the council, to postpone this,” he said. “It’s in all of our interests to lock up the mayor and the chief of staff and say go negotiate a strong agreement that deals with all of these issues.”

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"textStyle"},{"type":"bold"}],"text":"Public Vs. Closed Doors"}]

Emmons said agreements like Wolfe is seeking can still take place without any postponement.

“We’re going to have those studies,” she said. “They have to provide the studies through EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), through the county, through the city. They have to do those things in order to go forward anyway. I feel strongly we can proceed with this and still make sure that everything is done appropriately.

That’s a process, Wolfe countered, that will happen behind “closed doors.”

“So while yes, you’re right that some of that work may be done, the reason you put it into an annexation agreement — and the reason they did it in the Sweetgrass annexation is that they’re locked into it by contract — and that’s what we need to do now,” he said. “If we miss this opportunity to get an annexation agreement now, and define these issues and define their obligations ... because remember, they want these things not in place now but 10 years from now, we better be awfully careful and awfully thoughtful. Because in 10 years from now who knows what the environmental constraints are going to be?”

Laybourn argued that Cheyenne does have great needs that should be considered in light of the annexation, and suggested it’s not extortion to expect some agreements up front that will cover economic impacts, especially given that the facilities do not go through the Industrial Siting Commission.

“We believe it's a legitimate attempt, a good-faith attempt to look at something that's never happened here before, and probably will never happen again,” Laybourn said. “And to try to make sure that right from the initiation of that annexation we have these conditions, and these conditions are serious, so I'm sorry that some individuals seem to believe that those of us that support this are obstructionists or unrealistic or trying to, I can't imagine what our motivation could be. My motivation is to look at these facts.”

Monday’s vote was the second of three required readings by the city council on the annexation. The council will still have to take a third and final vote. 

If approved on final reading, the annexation will clear the way for Microsoft to begin detailed planning for a multi-decade data center buildout on Cheyenne’s southern edge.

Microsoft city council 6 23 26

<title>Cheyenne OK’s Huge Microsoft Annexation, Rejects $50M Community Benefits Deal | Cowboy State Daily</title>

Cheyenne’s City Council moved a massive 3,500-acre data center annexation closer to approval Monday night, rejecting an effort to secure a $50 million community benefits agreement that Mayor Patrick Collins recently described as "extortion."

Cheyenne OK’s Huge Microsoft Annexation, Rejects $50M Community Benefits Deal

Headshot of Cowboy State Daily's Feature Reporter, Andrew Rossi.

Andrew Rossi

Wyoming Life

Wyoming got more than 15 hours of daylight on June 21, the summer solstice.

It’s lost nearly 10 seconds of daylight since then, and it’ll keep getting darker, earlier and later, until Christmas.

Over the next three months, Wyoming will start losing daylight at an increasingly fast pace. What starts as a few seconds on June 22 will be several minutes by late September.

It won’t stop until the winter solstice on Dec. 21. There’s still plenty of long summer nights ahead, but the days are already getting shorter.

“It’s not that noticeable now, but we’ll be losing two minutes per day by the end of July,” said Max Gilbraith, planetarium coordinator at the University of Wyoming. “The sun’s going to be at a slightly lower angle every day until Dec. 21, and then it starts all over again."

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"bold"}],"text":"To The Minute"}]

The summer solstice is the longest day of the year, but in Wyoming the exact moment of the solstice occurred at 2:44 a.m. June 21.

“That’s technically when the sun is directly over the Tropic of Cancer,” Gilbraith said. “It’s the instantaneous moment where the Earth's Northern Hemisphere is maximally tilted toward the sun.”

That doesn’t make the longest day of the year any longer, but figuring out the exact timing of these events is something many civilizations have 

“The Medicine Wheel in Bighorn National Forest was designed to get the exact dates of the solstices correct,” Gilbraith said. “That’s a Wyoming connection to astronomy and the summer solstice that goes back over 1,500 years.”

Gilbraith added that our concept of time can be traced to “the first civilization.”

“The Babylonians developed the 60-counting system based on the 360 degrees of a circle, which is very close to the 365 days in a year,” he said.

Most Wyomingites aren’t aware of this astrological significance in human history. What they know is that Wyoming got a lot of glorious daylight that Sunday.

The longest day of the year was longer depending on where you were in Wyoming.

Laramie, in southern Wyoming, got 15 hours, nine minutes, and 43 seconds of daylight June 21. Meanwhile, Ranchester got 15 hours, 36 minutes, and 18 seconds of daylight on the same day.

“That’s almost an extra 30 minutes from southern to northern Wyoming,” Gilbraith said.

Since then, the Earth’s tilt has been gradually shifting as it continues its orbit  the sun. That’s why the seconds have started to slowly slip away.

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"bold"}],"text":"Still Sun"}]

“Solstice” is derived from the Latin phrase “still sun.” According to Gilbraith, the sun appears to stay in the same spot during the summer and winter solstices.

“The sun appears to rise, set and hang out in the same spot in the sky for several days,” he said. “It does move during those days, but it’s not that noticeable. That’s why we’ve only lost a few seconds in the last two days.”

The loss of daylight won’t be noticeable for several weeks. After all, how noticeable is a 20-second loss of daylight per day in late June?

The further we get from the summer solstice, 

. It’ll happen sooner than many realize.

A 15-hour day at the beginning of July will be around 14 hours and 23 minutes by the end of July. That's when the losses really start to add up, as much as two minutes a day going into August.

"If you lose two minutes a day every day for a month, that's an hour of daylight lost,' Gilbraith said. "And the amount of daylight lost per day will only increase from there." 

 will have around nine hours and 12 minutes of daylight in Laramie. Ranchester, meanwhile, will have around eight hours and 27 minutes of daylight.

“We’re physically closer to the sun in the Northern Hemisphere during winter," Gilbraith said. "It's the length of day and the angle of the sun that causes the seasons.”

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"bold"}],"text":"Later Sunrise Or Earlier Sunset?"}]

When Wyoming loses daylight, do sunrises get later, or do sunsets get earlier?

It’s both, according to Gilbraith, as the loss of daylight impacts both ends of the day evenly.

“I think most people's perception is that that afternoon is getting darker earlier,” he said. “The sunset is changing, but so is the sunrise. It’s not just one.”

However, the elephant in the room is an arbitrary difference that’s been in place for more than a century: Daylight Saving Time.

“The length of the day is always changing, but it’d be easier to track without Daylight Saving Time,” Gilbraith said. “It started as ‘War Time’ in World War I because they wanted to save electricity for factories. So, they moved the clock up so people would use less light in the evenings.”

Many people continue to advocate for the United States to 

. Nothing’s come of it yet, at least not in an actionable way.

Wyoming is ready to adopt permanent Daylight Saving Time. The Wyoming Legislature passed a trigger bill in 2020, but it only takes effect if the federal government passes similar legislation.

The federal government has been unable and hasn’t tried since 2018.

[{"type":"text","marks":[{"type":"bold"}],"text":"Those \"Long\" Summer Nights"}]

Nobody likes the idea of the slow but inevitable loss of sunlight that’s already started, but it doesn’t happen overnight. That’s why the equinoxes are significant.

Equinox is another Latin-derived term for “equal night.” It’s the two points of the year, in April and September, when the sun is directly over the equator.

It’s also when Wyoming loses or gains the most daylight, depending on the season. On the September equinox, Gilbraith said we’ll lose nearly 3 minutes of sunlight each day.

“The rising and setting position in the sun is slowest close to the solstices and fastest near the equinoxes," he said. "It peaks around 2 minutes, 43 seconds per day at the September equinox."

As we draw closer the September equinox, the amount of daylight lost each day will slowly increase every day. However, there's still plenty of time to enjoy the summer sun.

“Days will remain longer than nights until September 20,” Gilbraith said. “As much as it's all downhill from here, we still have to look forward to December. Our ancestors built Stonehenge to remind themselves that the daylight comes back.”

Sunrise 9 13 24

<title>Now That It's Summer, Wyoming Is Losing Daylight Every Day | Cowboy State Daily</title>

Parts of Wyoming saw more than 15 hours of daylight on June 21, the summer solstice. Now the days are getting shorter. “It’s not that noticeable now, but we’ll be losing two minutes per day by the end of July," said UW planetarium's Max Gilbraith.

Now That It's Summer, Wyoming Is Losing Daylight Every Day

Heinz mark

Mark Heinz

Outdoors

The situation with the Colorado River is dire, and likely will keep getting worse if the river continues to be managed according to arcane policies, officials representing the four Upper Basin states said Tuesday.

Water-management policy needs to shift away from legal wrangling and toward the realities of water availability, or hydrology, members of the Upper Colorado River Commission said during a meeting in Denver.

The commission didn’t make any policy decisions, and plans to meet again this summer.

At a meeting in Denver on Tuesday, Wyoming's state engineer said 2026 is "one of the worst, if not the worst, hydrologic years on record" due to the dire water situation in the Colorado River's Upper Basin states. He said Green River Basin ranchers will be hit especially hard.

You Still Here? Tuesday, May 16, 2023

In case you missed it

More in You Still Here

Today In Parenting: Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Steve Inman: Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Today In Crime: Wednesday, June 24, 2026

You Still Here? Wednesday, June 24, 2026

Most read