Category archive

Liz Cheney

Liz Cheney, Bob Budd: Sage Grouse Management Continues To Be Critical For Wyoming’s Future

in Liz Cheney/Column

***For All Things Wyoming, Sign-Up For Our Daily Newsletter***

By Liz Cheney and Bob Budd, guest columnists

Based on legal decisions last year, the Department of Interior has begun the process of updating Sage-Grouse RMP Amendments which were completed in 2019 under the previous administration.

Having been through the long and arduous process of developing and revising these amendments under the previous two Administrations, we don’t relish the thought of doing it again, but such is the hand we’ve been dealt.

With a “glass half full” mentality, we should look at this process as an opportunity to tackle issues that were not fully addressed. In some states, this may mean getting habitat designations more closely defined.  In others, it may apply to adaptive management triggers, habitat restoration, or how to apply compensatory mitigation. Each state has unique issues that need to be addressed locally.

This is particularly true in Wyoming where we have the highest number of birds and the most habitat of any state across its range.

Beginning in 2007, Wyoming proactively addressed sage-grouse management and conservation through an unprecedented collaborative process; energy, agriculture, conservation groups, community stakeholders and local, state, and federal government representatives worked together and developed the Wyoming Greater Sage-Grouse Core Area Protection plan. All Sage-grouse in Wyoming are protected, and more than 85% of the species are in highly-protected core areas.

The plan sets strict limitations on development on nearly a quarter of the state’s landmass, which is designated as priority habitat for the bird.

This approach to conservation, now approaching 16 years of implementation, has been used as a model for addressing multiple conservation issues, and has been replicated in nearly every western state. The fundamental underpinning of this strategy is inclusion, science-based decision making, shared responsibility, and local solutions.

Today, we have numerous concerns to address, some new, some that remain from our earliest efforts. Wildland fire, invasive annual grasses, conifer encroachment, and drought are some, but the recent rise of rural subdivision, renewable energy and other impacts cannot be ignored.

If we choose to conserve Sage-Grouse and other species, it is time to re-think how we compensate habitat providers, and how we develop our resources in a responsible manner.

The robust protections afforded through the state plan clearly show this will work. We have actually increased Sage-Grouse habitat while maintaining multiple uses that are so important to our state, our citizens, our way of life and our economy.

With this in mind, we fully expect DOI to be a reliable federal partner committed to meeting the multiple use needs of our state and its people by giving full consideration to the state plan that’s in place while we work together to update the RMP Amendments. We’ve done this twice before, and we can do it again.

Liz Cheney represents Wyoming in the United States House of Representatives and serves as Vice Chair of the Congressional Western Caucus. Bob Budd is the Executive Director of the Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resource Trust. He is also Chair of the Wyoming Sage-Grouse Implementation team

***For All Things Wyoming, Sign-Up For Our Daily Newsletter***

Liz Cheney: Jan. 6 Committee Won’t Be Intimidated

in Liz Cheney/Column

***For All Things Wyoming, Sign-Up For Our Daily Newsletter***

By U.S. Rep. Liz Cheney, guest columnist

I keep on my desk a copy of the oath my great-great-grandfather signed when he re-enlisted in the Union Army in 1863. Like the oath given by all those who serve in government and every member of our armed forces, Samuel Fletcher Cheney swore to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.” Generations of Americans have sworn that same oath and given their lives to defend the Constitution and our nation.

Last week, former Vice President Mike Pence spoke about the events of Jan. 6, 2021. President Trump was “wrong,” he said, to insist that Mr. Pence or any vice president could “overturn” the election by refusing to count certified slates of electoral votes. That notion was, as Mr. Pence said, “un-American.” What Mr. Trump had insisted that Mr. Pence do on Jan. 6 was not only un-American, it was unconstitutional and illegal.

Article II and the 12th Amendment govern how the nation selects the president. Congress doesn’t select the president; the states do. Every state in the union now selects a presidential candidate through a popular vote. And every state identifies the manner in which disputes regarding the election are addressed under state law.

Those laws set forth a process for challenging an election when concerns arise, including potential recounts or audits and an opportunity to litigate disputed issues in court. When courts have resolved any election challenges, and the election result has been certified by the governor of a state, the election is over. That is the rule of law.

The 12th Amendment also leaves little doubt that Congress must count the certified electoral votes it receives from the states: “The president of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted. The person having the greatest number of votes for president, shall be the president.”

This provision doesn’t say, for example, Congress must count certified electoral votes unless it has concerns about fraud allegations, or unless it disagrees with the outcome of state or federal court litigation. And the vice president, as president of the Senate presiding over the count, can’t simply refuse to count a state’s certified slate of electoral votes—either under the Constitution or under the Electoral Count Act of 1887.

Republicans used to advocate fidelity to the rule of law and the plain text of the Constitution. In 2020, Mr. Trump convinced many to abandon those principles. He falsely claimed that the election was stolen from him because of widespread fraud.

While some degree of fraud occurs in every election, there was no evidence of fraud on a scale that could have changed this one. As the Select Committee will demonstrate in hearings later this year, no foreign power corrupted America’s voting machines, and no massive secret fraud changed the election outcome.

Almost all members of Congress know this—although many lack the courage to say it out loud. Mr. Trump knew it too, from his own campaign officials, from his own appointees at the Justice Department, and from the dozens of lawsuits he lost.

Yet, Mr. Trump ignored the rulings of the courts and launched a massive campaign to mislead the public. Our hearings will show that these falsehoods provoked the violence on Jan. 6. Mr. Trump’s lawyers have begun to pay the price for spreading these lies.

For example, Rudy Giuliani’s license to practice law has been suspended because he “communicated demonstrably false and misleading statements to courts, lawmakers and the public at large in his capacity as lawyer for former President Donald J. Trump, ” in the words of a New York appellate court.

The Jan. 6 investigation isn’t only about the inexcusable violence of that day: It is also about fidelity to the Constitution and the rule of law, and whether elected representatives believe in those things or not. One member of the House Freedom Caucus warned the White House in the days before Jan. 6 that the president’s plans would drive “a stake in the heart of the federal republic.” That was exactly right.

Those who do not wish the truth of Jan. 6 to come out have predictably resorted to attacking the process—claiming it is tainted and political.

Our hearings will show this charge to be wrong. We are focused on facts, not rhetoric, and we will present those facts without exaggeration, no matter what criticism we face.

My friend the late Charles Krauthammer once said: “The lesson of our history is that the task of merely maintaining strong and sturdy the structures of a constitutional order is unending, the continuing and ceaseless work of every generation.” Every generation of Americans has fulfilled its duty to support and defend the Constitution. That responsibility now falls to us.

***For All Things Wyoming, Sign-Up For Our Daily Newsletter***

Liz Cheney: The GOP Is At A Turning Point. History Is Watching Us.

in Liz Cheney/Column

***For All Things Wyoming, Sign-Up For Our Daily Newsletter***

By Liz Cheney, guest columnist

In public statements again this week, former president Donald Trump has repeated his claims that the 2020 election was a fraud and was stolen. His message: I am still the rightful president, and President Biden is illegitimate. Trump repeats these words now with full knowledge that exactly this type of language provoked violence on Jan. 6.

And, as the Justice Department and multiple federal judges have suggested, there is good reason to believe that Trump’s language can provoke violence again. Trump is seeking to unravel critical elements of our constitutional structure that make democracy work — confidence in the result of elections and the rule of law. No other American president has ever done this.

The Republican Party is at a turning point, and Republicans must decide whether we are going to choose truth and fidelity to the Constitution. In the immediate wake of the violence of Jan. 6, almost all of us knew the gravity and the cause of what had just happened — we had witnessed it firsthand.

House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) left no doubt in his public remarks. On the floor of the House on Jan. 13, McCarthy said: “The president bears responsibility for Wednesday’s attack on Congress by mob rioters. He should have immediately denounced the mob when he saw what was unfolding.” Now, McCarthy has changed his story.

I am a conservative Republican, and the most conservative of conservative values is reverence for the rule of law. Each of us swears an oath before God to uphold our Constitution. The electoral college has spoken. More than 60 state and federal courts, including multiple Trump-appointed judges, have rejected the former president’s arguments, and refused to overturn election results. That is the rule of law; that is our constitutional system for resolving claims of election fraud.

The question before us now is whether we will join Trump’s crusade to delegitimize and undo the legal outcome of the 2020 election, with all the consequences that might have. I have worked overseas in nations where changes in leadership come only with violence, where democracy takes hold only until the next violent upheaval.

America is exceptional because our constitutional system guards against that. At the heart of our republic is a commitment to the peaceful transfer of power among political rivals in accordance with law. President Ronald Reagan described this as our American “miracle.”

While embracing or ignoring Trump’s statements might seem attractive to some for fundraising and political purposes, that approach will do profound long-term damage to our party and our country.

Trump has never expressed remorse or regret for the attack of Jan. 6 and now suggests that our elections, and our legal and constitutional system, cannot be trusted to do the will of the people.

This is immensely harmful, especially as we now compete on the world stage against Communist China and its claims that democracy is a failed system.

For Republicans, the path forward is clear.

First, support the ongoing Justice Department criminal investigations of the Jan. 6 attack. Those investigations must be comprehensive and objective; neither the White House nor any member of Congress should interfere.

Second, we must support a parallel bipartisan review by a commission with subpoena power to seek and find facts; it will describe for all Americans what happened. This is critical to defeat the misinformation and nonsense circulating in the press and on social media. No currently serving member of Congress — with an eye to the upcoming election cycle — should participate.

We should appoint former officials, members of the judiciary and other prominent Americans who can be objective, just as we did after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The commission should be focused on the Jan. 6 attacks. The Black Lives Matter and antifa violence of last summer was illegal and reprehensible, but it is a different problem with a different solution.

Finally, we Republicans need to stand for genuinely conservative principles, and steer away from the dangerous and anti-democratic Trump cult of personality. In our hearts, we are devoted to the American miracle. We believe in the rule of law, in limited government, in a strong national defense, and in prosperity and opportunity brought by low taxes and fiscally conservative policies.

There is much at stake now, including the ridiculous wokeness of our political rivals, the irrational policies at the border and runaway spending that threatens a return to the catastrophic inflation of the 1970s.

Reagan formed a broad coalition from across the political spectrum to return America to sanity, and we need to do the same now. We know how. But this will not happen if Republicans choose to abandon the rule of law and join Trump’s crusade to undermine the foundation of our democracy and reverse the legal outcome of the last election.

History is watching. Our children are watching. We must be brave enough to defend the basic principles that underpin and protect our freedom and our democratic process. I am committed to doing that, no matter what the short-term political consequences might be.

***For All Things Wyoming, Sign-Up For Our Daily Newsletter***

Go to Top